FAQ - Kongsberg Precision Cutting Systems

FAQs – Which Kongsberg Table Should I Choose? ▼

How do I cut corrugated boxes at the highest speed? ▼

For maximum throughput and clean, die‑like edges in corrugated board, the Kongsberg Ultimate delivers the highest acceleration and cutting performance in corrugated production.

Which table is best for cutting rigid signage, acrylic or ACM? ▼

The Kongsberg C‑Series offers high speed and powerful precision routing for rigid materials such as acrylic, aluminum composite and wood.

What is the most versatile table for mixed applications? ▼

The Kongsberg X‑Series is designed as a flexible, upgradable multi‑purpose platform suitable for signage, packaging, samples and display work.

How can I cut foam materials with clean, accurate edges? ▼

Foam up to medium thickness is easily processed using the Foam Cutting Unit on the Kongsberg C‑Series. Thicker or more complex foam structures can be produced using the FoamHead on the Kongsberg X‑Series.

How do I cut V‑notches at different angles without changing tools? ▼

The VariAngle tool automatically adjusts cutting angles between 0° and 60° without changing tools. It works with both the Kongsberg C‑Series and the Kongsberg Ultimate.

Should we choose the C‑Series or Ultimate for POP displays? ▼

For signage and display versatility, the Kongsberg C‑Series is the best choice. For the highest corrugated throughput, the Kongsberg Ultimate is recommended.

Which table is best for rapid prototypes and small packaging runs? ▼

The Kongsberg X‑Series offers strong accuracy and flexibility for prototypes and short‑run packaging.

Which table can handle the widest range of materials across packaging, signage and display? ▼

If you work with corrugated, folding carton, solid board, foam, wood‑based boards and plastics, the Kongsberg X is positioned as the platform for the broadest application range and tooling compatibility.

Which table is best for heavy-duty routing like acrylic, MDF and aluminum composite? ▼

When routing is a core part of your business, spindle power and duty‑cycle matter. Kongsberg X supports high‑power milling for demanding rigid materials. Kongsberg C also supports heavy‑duty milling and is optimized for wide‑format signage routing environments.

Which table is built for continuous high-volume corrugated and display production? ▼

For continuous, high‑volume, multi‑batch corrugated and display production, the Kongsberg Ultimate is purpose‑built for those demanding workflows.

Which table delivers the highest speed and acceleration for maximum throughput? ▼

When throughput is the priority, the Kongsberg Ultimate delivers the highest speed and acceleration for large corrugated and display jobs. The Kongsberg C is also engineered for fast wide‑format production.

Which table is best for wide-format signage and large rigid boards? ▼

For wide‑format signage and large rigid board workflows, the Kongsberg C is a super‑wide production platform designed for high‑speed sign and display work.

Which table gives the best print-to-cut registration on distorted prints? ▼

For demanding print‑to‑cut applications where distortion is common, the Kongsberg X provides strong registration performance to maintain accuracy even on stretched or irregular prints.

Which table is best when creasing quality is critical for packaging and corrugated? ▼

For challenging creasing applications, the Kongsberg C offers strong creasing performance with heavy‑duty tooling. For high‑volume corrugated converters, the Kongsberg Ultimate is optimized for continuous high‑quality creasing.

Which table supports automation to reduce operator touch time? ▼

To scale output without increasing labor, the Kongsberg X can be configured with automation options. The Kongsberg C also supports production‑focused automation for efficient wide‑format workflows.

Which table is the strongest workhorse for signage and display with mixed rigid materials? ▼

For signage and display using rigid boards, foams and plastics, the Kongsberg C is positioned as a stable wide‑format production workhorse for mixed material environments.

Which table makes the most sense if we expect to grow into new applications? ▼

For businesses scaling into new materials or workflows, the Kongsberg X is designed to be upgradeable so capabilities can expand as your production grows.

Which table can handle thicker corrugated and display substrates? ▼

When thickness is a constraint, the Kongsberg Ultimate is built to handle heavier corrugated and display substrates used in high‑volume environments.

Which table is best when repeatability and cut quality at speed matter most? ▼

For high‑speed production where accuracy still matters, the Kongsberg C focuses on stability and repeatability. For extreme‑throughput corrugated and display work, the Kongsberg Ultimate maintains consistent quality at high speed.

FAQ – Which table should I choose (markets - short answers) ▼

Corrugated packaging ▼

For corrugated cutting, what helps most when we run a busy, high-volume schedule every day? ▼

Ultimate helps you keep output predictable when volumes stay high, because it’s built for maximum uptime and throughput. C and X still do the work; they help more when your corrugated workload is mixed with other applications or shorter runs.

For corrugated cutting, what helps when we’re juggling many short-run jobs and constant changeovers? ▼

C helps you stay flexible across varied corrugated substrates and keep jobs moving without losing time in setup. X helps when you want a simpler, cost-effective workflow that’s easy to run and expand later. Ultimate helps when the short runs are still industrial volume and you want speed plus stability at scale.

For corrugated cutting, what tooling helps us cut faster without tearing or messy edges? ▼

CorruSpeed-style corrugated cutting helps increase speed without oscillation, protecting edge quality even when board quality varies. All tables can run corrugated work; the tooling choice is what protects quality at higher speeds.

For corrugated cutting, what tooling helps reduce cracking and improve fold quality across different flute types? ▼

Crease wheel tooling helps you get more consistent creases and reduces cracking when flute type, thickness or recycled content changes from job to job. The table choice is then about whether you need maximum throughput (Ultimate) or maximum job flexibility (C/X).

For corrugated cutting, what helps when we also produce display on the same workflow? ▼

Ultimate helps when corrugated and display output is high and constant, so you’re not fighting schedule pressure. C helps when you need a production-ready workhorse that adapts quickly across materials. X helps when your mix changes often and you want a scalable setup that grows with you.

Display production ▼

For display production, what helps with tight turnarounds and short runs without sacrificing quality? ▼

C and X help you stay flexible across materials and formats, switching jobs quickly while keeping finishing consistent. Ultimate helps when “short runs” still arrive nonstop and you need high volume and uptime.

For display production, what helps when we build complex 3D structures and need cut and crease accuracy to stay consistent? ▼

C helps maintain stable precision across full-size boards, supporting clean folds and accurate alignment. X helps when switching across many materials with fast setup. Ultimate helps when complex displays are produced at high volume where speed pressure is constant.

For display production, what tooling helps when we use demanding materials and want cleaner results? ▼

A tooling setup that covers precise cutting, creasing and routing helps tackle demanding display materials without compromise. All three tables can run the applications; the difference is whether you want maximum throughput (Ultimate), a production workhorse (C), or an easy-to-run system that can expand (X).

For display production, what helps reduce waste and rework on printed display jobs? ▼

Strong print-to-cut registration and stable depth control help avoid mis-cuts and near-misses. C and X help when flexibility and quick setup matter; Ultimate helps maintain precision while pushing high-volume output.

For display production, what helps when we want to scale output but keep manual handling down? ▼

Ultimate helps relieve workflow pressure when production intensity is high. C helps when you want flexible production that adapts across jobs. X helps when you want to scale capability step-by-step.

Signage production ▼

For signage production, what helps when we process wide-format rigid boards daily? ▼

C helps you handle wide-format work with stable precision across full-size boards. X can support the same applications and helps when you plan to expand formats and workflows over time. Ultimate can handle signage but is typically chosen when you need industrial throughput instead of variety.

For signage production, what helps most when routing is a daily requirement? ▼

C and X both help produce cleaner edges using strong milling capability, often the difference between a cut and a finished result. Ultimate can route too, and helps when routing sits inside a high‑volume corrugated/display workflow.

For signage production, what helps when we need crisp contour cuts that match printed sheets? ▼

C helps maintain stable accuracy across large printed boards, keeping contour cuts aligned. X helps when you want fast, accurate finishing across a wide range of jobs with an easy workflow.

For signage production, what tooling helps when we need clean cuts on rigid materials at speed? ▼

Rigid-material cutting tooling helps you keep edge quality consistent without slowing down. The table choice becomes wide-format stability and production feel (C) or scalability and quick setup (X).

For signage production, what helps operators when moving from manual finishing to digital? ▼

X helps because it’s simple to learn and quick to set up, aiding teams transitioning from manual finishing. C helps when wide-format capability and robust production feel are needed from day one. Ultimate helps when reducing manual steps under constant production pressure is the priority.

Sample making ▼

For sample making, what helps us produce prototypes fast across folding carton, corrugated, and paperboards? ▼

X helps reduce manual tool changes and speed up iterations, supporting faster approvals. C can also support sample work, especially when the same system handles broader production. Ultimate can do samples too, but helps most when sample making sits inside a high-volume environment.

For sample making, what helps when designs are compact and complex but still need clean accuracy? ▼

Accurate cutting helps avoid rework on tight details. C helps with production-grade stability; X helps when you need fast, easy tool handling for frequent design changes.

For sample making, what helps when tool changes are slowing the workflow down? ▼

Fast tool loading with automatic recognition and calibration shortens setup time. X is often chosen for quick-iteration workflows; C supports it well when sample-making sits within a broader production floor.

For sample making, what helps when we want the same platform to grow into short-run production later? ▼

X helps because you can upgrade speed and acceleration as needs change. C helps when you want a production-ready workhorse that handles varied jobs. Ultimate helps when your future clearly involves high-volume, nonstop production.

Protective packaging production ▼

For protective packaging, what helps when we cut corrugated boxes plus foam inserts? ▼

C and X support mixed-material workflows ideal for protective packaging, producing corrugated structures and foam inserts in one process. Ultimate becomes relevant when protective packaging sits inside a continuous corrugated line.

For protective packaging, what helps us work faster using templates and repeatable designs? ▼

A templated workflow helps shorten turnaround and reduce manual steps. X supports quick iteration and repeatability; C helps when you want flexible production across materials. Ultimate helps when repeatable output needs to run at high volume.

For protective packaging, what tooling helps us cut corrugated fast, even with recycled content boards? ▼

CorruSpeed-style cutting provides time savings and preserves quality across a wide range of corrugated boards, including recycled content. The tooling protects speed and precision regardless of table choice.

For protective packaging, what tooling helps foam inserts fit better with fewer mistakes? ▼

Foam-focused cutting capability helps maintain clean edges and consistent depth, improving fit quality. C and X support mixed protective workflows; Ultimate helps when foam fits into high-volume corrugated production.

Labels and decals production ▼

For labels and decals, what helps when we need kiss cutting without damaging the liner? ▼

Kiss-cut tooling cuts the top layer while keeping the liner intact, helping application stay smooth. Table choice depends on whether you need flexible mixed jobs (C/X) or high-pressure production handling (Ultimate).

For labels and decals, what helps when we cut fine details and want accuracy to stay consistent? ▼

Detail-focused cutting tools keep small shapes clean, reducing tearing and corner issues. C helps when you want a robust production workflow; X helps when you want quick setup.

For labels and decals, what helps when we want high volumes of wide-format soft signage from rolls? ▼

A roll-feeding workflow helps you run high volumes of soft signage with fewer manual steps. C and X suit flexible roll-plus-sheet environments; Ultimate helps when roll work runs inside a nonstop production schedule.

For labels and decals, what helps make roll-to-roll finishing and waste handling easier? ▼

A take-up unit for flexible materials helps collect waste and produce cleaner roll-to-roll output. Table choice depends on whether you need mixed material flexibility or high-throughput priorities.

Flexographic plate production ▼

For flexographic plates, what helps reduce manual handling and lower the risk of plate damage? ▼

A digital cutting workflow reduces touch points, helping protect sensitive plates and improving repeatability. X helps when you want an easy workflow that can expand. C supports broader production when plates are part of a larger environment. Ultimate helps when plate workflows belong inside high-throughput production.

For flexographic plates, what helps when accuracy is critical and plates are sensitive? ▼

A plate-safe, precise cutting approach helps reduce surface damage and scrap. C helps when you want stable production-grade control. X helps with fast setup and frequent job switching.

For flexographic plates, what helps if we also want to produce packaging or boxes on the same system? ▼

All tables support multi-use workflows. X helps you expand capability without adding complexity too early. C helps when you need one flexible workhorse for many job types. Ultimate helps when you must keep a busy schedule moving at industrial pace.

FAQ – Which table should I choose (materials – short answers) ▼

Corrugated material ▼

For corrugated, what helps most when we run high volumes and many job changes every day? ▼

All three tables can cut corrugated. Ultimate helps keep throughput predictable when production is constant. C and X help when corrugated is part of a wider mix and you want flexibility without slowing changeovers.

For corrugated, what helps when edges tear or the liner cracks at higher speeds? ▼

Corrugated‑focused high‑speed cutting helps you push speed while protecting edge quality. Ultimate helps maintain that quality at industrial pace, while C and X keep results consistent across mixed jobs and varying board qualities.

For corrugated, what tooling helps improve fold quality across different flute types? ▼

Crease wheel tooling improves consistency and reduces cracking across flute types. Ultimate fits nonstop volume, C fits production workhorse environments, and X fits flexible short runs with room to scale.

Folding carton and paper ▼

For folding carton and paper, what helps when we need fine detail and clean cut quality? ▼

All three tables handle carton and paper. X and C fit frequent design changes with fast repeatable setups. Ultimate fits high‑output environments requiring consistent quality.

For folding carton and paper, what helps us crease cleanly without cracking? ▼

Smaller‑format creasing keeps folds clean and consistent. C fits stable production, X fits quick changeovers, and Ultimate fits high‑pressure workflows needing constant crease quality.

For folding carton and paper, what tooling helps mark samples for assembly or QA? ▼

A pen or plotting tool helps annotate sheets clearly. X and C suit frequent marking workflows; Ultimate suits marking inside high-volume production.

Cardboard ▼

For cardboard, what helps when we need reliable cut and crease on repeat jobs? ▼

All tables handle cardboard. Ultimate fits all‑day repeat runs, C fits mixed‑material production, and X fits short‑run scalable workflows.

For cardboard, what helps when we need multiple operations without stopping? ▼

Multi‑tool workflows cut, crease, and add features without stopping. Ultimate supports nonstop scale; C and X support varied jobs with fast switching.

For cardboard, what tooling helps with tear lines and easy-open features? ▼

Perforation tooling creates consistent tear lines. Ultimate maintains consistency at high pace; C and X work well for varied job requirements.

Rigid board ▼

For rigid board, what helps when routing is the difference between “cut” and “finished”? ▼

High‑power milling enables routing, drilling, and engraving for a finished look. C and X fit routing workflows; Ultimate fits high‑throughput environments.

For rigid board, what helps improve edge quality on acrylics and similar plastics? ▼

Stable milling reduces chipping. C suits wide‑format stability, X suits flexible short runs, and Ultimate suits heavy‑output needs.

For rigid board, what tooling helps with fast, clean cutting of foamed PVC-style boards? ▼

A rigid‑material knife keeps cuts clean at speed. C suits large daily boards, X suits flexible rigid workflows, Ultimate suits nonstop rigid production.

Flexible material ▼

For flexible materials, what helps prevent distortion while cutting textiles, mesh or banner-like substrates? ▼

Flexible‑material tooling supports clean cuts when vacuum hold‑down is ineffective. C suits wide‑format signage, X suits mixed applications, Ultimate suits continuous workflows.

For flexible materials, what helps when we need fast turnaround across many different flexible substrates? ▼

Quick-change tooling helps reduce downtime. X excels in variety, C in wide-format stability, Ultimate in scale throughput.

For flexible materials, what helps when we want roll workflows with fewer manual steps? ▼

Roll-handling setups reduce manual work. C and X suit roll-plus-sheet workflows, Ultimate suits continuous roll production.

Foam and foam core board ▼

For foam, what helps us cut thicker foam cleanly with consistent depth? ▼

Foam-focused tooling keeps depth consistent and edges clean. C and X fit mixed workflows; Ultimate fits foam inside high‑throughput corrugated/display environments.

For foam core board, what helps reduce edge crush and improve finish for display work? ▼

Foam‑capable tooling protects fragile cores. C fits wide‑format boards, X fits frequent switching, Ultimate fits constant display production.

For foam, what helps when we want higher productivity without adding manual rework? ▼

Stable control and foam‑appropriate tooling reduce recuts and touch-ups. Ultimate suits scale productivity; C and X suit varied foam jobs.

Aluminium and ACM ▼

For aluminium and ACM, what helps when we need routing, drilling or engraving? ▼

High‑power milling improves edge quality. C and X suit day‑to‑day workloads; Ultimate suits high‑output environments.

For aluminium and ACM, what helps when jobs are complex, short-run, or frequently changing? ▼

Flexible setup and optimized tooling keep results consistent without slowing. X fits adaptable switching, C fits stable production speed, Ultimate fits nonstop throughput.

For aluminium and ACM, what helps protect finish quality and reduce rework? ▼

Specialized tooling and stable routing strategies maintain smooth finishes. Ultimate suits constant output; C suits stable production; X suits intuitive scalable workflows.

Wood and wood-based materials ▼

For wood-based materials, what helps keep routing quality consistent? ▼

A stable milling setup helps routing accuracy. C fits robust wide‑format production, X fits flexible workflows, Ultimate fits high‑throughput wood work.

For wood-based materials, what helps when we need faster routing without sacrificing consistency? ▼

High‑power milling improves routing speed while maintaining reliability. C fits production‑first routing, X fits flexible routing, Ultimate fits nonstop needs.

For wood-based materials, what helps reduce manual finishing steps after cutting? ▼

The right tooling and routing strategy reduce manual finishing. C suits daily large work; X suits high‑variety jobs; Ultimate suits high‑volume consistency.

Rubber materials ▼

For rubber, what helps cut cleanly without material lift or shifting? ▼

Rubber‑focused cutting helps control the material and reduce waste. X suits short‑run flexible work, C suits rubber in mixed production, Ultimate suits high‑throughput rubber workflows.

For rubber, what tooling helps most for thicker or tougher rubber variants? ▼

Longer‑stroke cutting handles tougher rubber cleanly. Ultimate suits constant volume, C suits versatile production, X suits flexible switching.

For rubber, what helps when rubber jobs are occasional but still need reliable results? ▼

A repeatable setup and rubber‑suitable tooling help occasional jobs run smoothly. C and X suit mixed workflows; Ultimate suits predictable high‑output environments.

Flexographic plates ▼

For flexographic plates, what helps reduce manual handling and protect plate quality? ▼

A plate‑focused digital workflow reduces touchpoints and plate damage. X fits flexible switching, C fits plate work inside larger production, Ultimate fits high‑output plate needs.

For flexographic plates, what helps when we need accurate cutting plus clear identification on the plate? ▼

Controlled top‑layer cutting adds ID marks without affecting plate quality. X and C support flexible workflows; Ultimate maintains consistency at production pace.

For flexographic plates, what helps when we also want to produce protective packaging for plates on the same system? ▼

A flexible workflow allows cutting plates and producing packaging components on the same system. X adapts to multiple tasks, C suits multi-purpose production, and Ultimate suits industrial pacing.

FAQ – Which table should I choose (markets - long answers) ▼

Corrugated packaging ▼

For corrugated packaging, what is the best table if we run continuous high‑volume, multi‑batch production all day? ▼

If constant demand, tight deadlines and repeated job changeovers are your reality, choose a table built for industrial throughput and uptime in corrugated and display production. Kongsberg Ultimate is positioned for that environment, delivering high‑speed output and the consistency corrugated converters depend on. Kongsberg C and Kongsberg X remain strong for samples, short runs and mixed corrugated work, but Ultimate is the platform designed to keep up with continuous demand.

For corrugated packaging, what is the best table if we mainly do samples and short runs, but want to scale later? ▼

For prototypes, mock‑ups and short‑run corrugated jobs, you’ll benefit from a setup that is easy now and expandable later. Kongsberg X is positioned to grow with your business, letting you start where you are and add automation, tooling and capacity as your corrugated workload evolves.

For corrugated packaging, what type of tooling helps increase speed without tearing or cracking the liner? ▼

When corrugated speed rises, the risk is tearing, liner cracking or messy edges. Corrugated high‑speed drag cutting designed around controlled down pressure helps you push throughput without oscillation, keeping the finish clean even when board quality varies.

For corrugated packaging, what tooling should we look at for clean creasing across different flute types? ▼

Creasing quality often makes or breaks corrugated output. Crease wheel solutions provide repeatable crease performance across a range of flute types and thicknesses, reducing cracking and keeping fold quality consistent across jobs.

For corrugated packaging, what is the best table if we also produce display work on the same line? ▼

If you switch between corrugated packaging and display production, you need flexibility across materials and formats without losing speed. Kongsberg Ultimate is designed specifically for high‑volume corrugated and display production, while Kongsberg C and Kongsberg X offer a broader mixed‑job approach for shorter runs and frequent changeovers.

Display production ▼

For display production, what is the best table if we need faster turnaround on short runs without increasing costs? ▼

Display work lives on tight deadlines, short runs and high expectations. A production‑focused platform with speed, quick setup and support for automated workflows is key. Kongsberg Ultimate targets high‑volume display performance, while Kongsberg C and Kongsberg X support varied display jobs where rapid changeovers matter.

For display production, what is the best table if we make complex 3D structures and need reliable cut and crease accuracy? ▼

Complex structures expose inconsistencies in cutting and creasing. You want stable accuracy across the sheet and reliable tooling that keeps folds, tabs and edges consistent. Kongsberg Ultimate is built for high‑speed display production; Kongsberg C and X offer flexibility for diverse substrates and design variations.

For display production, what tooling should we consider when we mix corrugated display board with rigid boards and foam? ▼

Mixed display materials require modular tooling. High‑speed corrugated cutting and creasing for corrugated board, and dedicated foam cutting with precise Z‑axis control for foam inserts. This combination is supported on Kongsberg C and X, while Ultimate focuses on high-throughput corrugated/display.

For display production, what is the best table if we want to reduce waste and rework on high‑expectation display jobs? ▼

Waste often stems from mis‑registration, inconsistent depth control and rushed changeovers. A platform supporting precise cutting, reliable depth control and quick setup helps reduce rework. Kongsberg C and X emphasize precision; Ultimate emphasizes speed and industrial-grade output.

For display production, what is the best table if we need to scale output fast and keep uptime predictable? ▼

When display demand spikes, you need a table that maintains throughput without compromising accuracy. Kongsberg Ultimate provides consistent productivity under high load. If scaling involves expanding material versatility, Kongsberg X grows flexibly with your needs.

Signage production ▼

For signage production, what is the best table if we cut a wide mix of rigid substrates like foam board, acrylic, PVC and aluminum composites? ▼

Signage requires flexibility across rigid substrates. Kongsberg C is positioned as a precision-focused wide-format platform for rigid panels, while Kongsberg X provides a versatile path that scales with changing workloads.

For signage production, what is the best table if routing is a daily requirement and edge quality really matters? ▼

If routing is central, choose a table with strong milling capability and stability at speed. Kongsberg C and X support powerful milling for routing, contour cutting, v-grooving, engraving and drilling across dense materials used in signage.

For signage production, what type of tooling should we use for high‑speed cutting of rigid board without sacrificing finish? ▼

High‑speed cutting of rigid boards requires knife tooling designed for clean edges at speed. Blade options spanning fine detail to heavier boards allow you to maintain finish quality while preserving throughput.

For signage production, what is the best table if we’re moving from manual cutting to digital and want something easy to learn? ▼

Transitioning from manual to digital benefits from simplicity and quick setup. Kongsberg X provides a strong entry point with professional results and clear upgrade paths.

For signage production, what is the best table if we need dependable throughput today but want a path to more automation later? ▼

A platform that supports modular tooling and automation options is ideal when planning for future scaling. Kongsberg X expands with automation, while Kongsberg C supports high-throughput signage from day one.

Sample making ▼

For sample making, what is the best table if we need rapid prototypes in minutes for folding carton, corrugated and paperboards? ▼

Sample making relies on speed, accuracy and repeatability. Kongsberg X supports a wide range of materials with minimal manual tool changes, enabling fast iterations for design teams.

For sample making, what tooling matters most when we need highly accurate cutting on compact, complex designs? ▼

Detailed designs need precise yet robust tooling. A tool head balancing fine accuracy with strength helps produce intricate shapes reliably across paperboards and synthetics.

For sample making, what is the best table if we want fewer manual steps and faster changeovers between tools? ▼

Automatic tool recognition and calibration along with fast tool loading reduce time lost during changeovers. Kongsberg X excels here, with Kongsberg C ideal when prototypes feed directly into production environments.

For sample making, what is the best table if we do samples now but expect the same platform to handle real production later? ▼

When samples lead to production, avoid outgrowing your table. Kongsberg X can start small and scale in speed, tools and automation as production demands increase.

Protective packaging production ▼

For protective packaging production, what is the best table if we cut corrugated boxes with foam inserts? ▼

Protective packaging is typically corrugated plus foam. Kongsberg C and X support both corrugated and foam cutting cleanly, while Ultimate fits when protective packaging runs as part of high-volume corrugated production.

For protective packaging production, what tooling helps us cut corrugated faster, especially when board quality varies? ▼

Corrugated-focused drag cutting designed to run fast without oscillation helps preserve quality even on recycled or variable boards, reducing time loss and defects.

For protective packaging production, what tooling should we consider to crease thicker corrugated without cracking the liner? ▼

Thicker corrugated can crack when creased improperly. Crease wheel tooling covers wide thickness ranges and helps maintain crease quality on heavier substrates.

For protective packaging production, what is the best table if turnaround time is the main KPI and we want a quick, repeatable workflow? ▼

Protective packaging excels with templated, repeatable workflows. Kongsberg C and X support flexible mixed-material production; Ultimate fits when the workload resembles continuous corrugated production.

Labels and decals production ▼

For labels and decals production, what is the best table if we do kiss cutting and need to keep the backing intact? ▼

Kiss cutting requires precise depth control to cut the top layer cleanly while preserving the liner. Dedicated kiss-cut tooling is essential for labels and decals workflows.

For labels and decals production, what tooling helps us cut fine details at high speed in thin materials? ▼

Fine‑detail knife tooling optimized for thin substrates (vinyl, foils, paper) helps maintain accuracy without sacrificing speed, especially for intricate shapes.

For labels and decals production, what is the best table if we want to move into roll‑based workflows? ▼

Roll-based workflows depend on feeding and take-up systems for consistent roll-to-roll finishing. Conveyor tables equipped for roll handling support smoother automation as you scale.

For labels and decals production, what is the best table if we produce both small labels and large decals across different materials? ▼

If you switch between small labels and large-format decals, choose a stable platform that maintains accuracy across diverse materials and supports dedicated tools for each cut type.

Flexographic plate production ▼

For flexographic plate production, what is the best table if we want to eliminate manual plate handling and reduce risk of damage? ▼

Flexo plates are fragile, and manual cutting risks damaging them. A digital workflow with controlled cutting reduces manual touchpoints and improves consistency.

For flexographic plate production, what tooling features matter when plates are sensitive and accuracy is critical? ▼

Precise, plate-safe tooling helps maintain quality while reducing contact with sensitive plate surfaces. Accurate cutting and careful design details are central to clean flexo workflows.

For flexographic plate production, what is the best table if we want the same system to also produce custom shipping boxes for finished plates? ▼

Upgradeable cutting platforms can handle both flexo plate workflows and additional tasks such as producing custom shipping boxes for finished plates, aligning with a “one platform, multiple outcomes” strategy.

Shaping your future together

Shaping
your
future
together